By Terminating a Harsh Conservative Welfare Policy, This Financial Plan Clearly Sets Out How Labour Will Wage the Struggle to Renew Britain
Yesterday, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour budget. People have been asking for Labour’s purpose and principles to be more clearly articulated. By way of the decisions made – a transition to a fairer tax system, focusing on wealth to pay for tackling child poverty, quality public services and the living expenses – we have clearly set out what we believe in.
That’s why Labour MPs applauded in the Commons, and it’s why we are up for the battles to come. And it’s why the protests from the right began immediately.
The Main Political Divide in UK Politics
The central dividing line in British politics is once again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who aim to change it so it benefits everyday working people, and on the other, our political opponents, who support the status quo and the unsuccessful doctrine of the past. We must now confront, and win, the argument.
The Tories had 14 years to resolve things and instead, by every standard, they got far more dire. Their doctrinaire austerity and supply-side economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, reducing investment (leaving us with poor productivity and wages), and neglecting to support young people after the pandemic – didn’t work.
Record of Decline Under the Former Administration
Quality of life dropped by the largest margin since records began, child poverty hit record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis took hold, young people affected by Covid were abandoned. The history of failure continues.
A single budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a long-term plan for rebuilding and for restructuring the country. And we have to go out and keep making the case for why our approach will reap dividends.
Social Security and Youth Deprivation
Under the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the underlying issues: low pay, high housing costs, deep inequalities in education, health and regions. The state is forced to paying more to deal with the effects instead of the solution.
That’s why we are constructing more social housing than for a generation, increasing wages and new rights for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and bringing down the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.
Ending the Two-Child Benefit Cap
It’s also why we are completely justified to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.
For almost a decade, since it was enacted, low-income families with children have suffered from a unjust social experiment that was marketed as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families affected by it have a parent in work.
It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, in the end, costs us more, as well as being heartless and immoral.
Real Impact in Communities
I know from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be lifted out of poverty as a result of ending the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed hungry and cold, living in overcrowded, damp homes, parents this Christmas relying on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already stretched but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of deep poverty.
Long-Term Consequences of Youth Hardship
Just one in four pupils from the most disadvantaged families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with almost 75% among wealthier families. This predisposes them for the disadvantages they face during their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and ill health. Children who grew up in poverty are more likely to be unemployed or poor as adults.
Confronting child poverty isn’t just a ethical duty, it is a long-term investment. Poverty costs the economy far, far more than the £3bn cost of removing the two-child cap, or extending free school meals.
That’s why we acted urgently in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred additional children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was crucial.
The cap was a totem to 14 years of unsuccessful conservative ideology. Now it is gone.
Equitable Financing for Policies
We, as Labour, can also be clear that these initiatives are being paid for in a just way – from a new gaming tax, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Final Thoughts
Equity and purpose – that’s how we will succeed in the contest of ideas. This budget is a definitive statement that we won the election as Labour, and will lead as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political platform and define the narrative more strongly about what’s truly flawed with the country and how we are fixing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.
So let’s maintain it and prevail in this fight about how we will rebuild Britain and tackle the entrenched inequalities holding us back.